THIN, FERTILE, AND REPUBLICAN. OH NO!
Is the opposite of this Fat, Sterile, and Democrat??
What's the angle here, Guardian writers??
The premise of the article is a warning about a "womanosphere" that's mirroring the "manosphere" that got Literally Hitler 2.0 elected into office.
Now, there are the beginnings of an organized effort to create a similar alternative rightwing media ecosystem targeting young female US audiences - one of the few demographics that has, until now, leaned substantially Democratic.
This new 'womanosphere' includes [Brett] Cooper's channel as well as lifestyle magazines like the Conservateur and Evie, Candace Owens's Club Candace, Alex Clark's Maha ('Make America Healthy Again') talkshow Culture Apothecary, conservative Christian influencer Allie Beth Stuckey's Relatable, and swimmer turned anti-transgender activist Riley Gaines's podcast Gaines For Girls.
If you know anything about anything, you know that those people are WILDLY different. Allie Beth Stuckey covers culture and politics from a Reformed Christian perspective.
Meanwhile, Candace Owens is a firebrand political commentator who became famous for leaving liberal politics and is now famous for joining antisemitic politics.
These two people are not the same and do not have the same audience or beliefs ... yet the Guardian lumps in this diverse set under one hostile label.
Consider how they frame Riley Gaines as an "anti-transgender activist" instead of a "woman's sports advocate." It tells you exactly how much of a bias the "journalists" at The Guardian have.
While the women behind these outlets all have different styles and tactics, they are mostly aligned in their desire to return to a gender-essentialist worldview: women as submissive homemakers, men as strong providers.
Talk about a straw-man fallacy!
I've listened to Allie Beth Stuckey's podcast for many years. She adheres to the biblical roles of men and women, made equal in the image of God. Her goal is not to teach women to make more sandwiches.
What about Riley Gaines? You think the competitive swimmer's goal is to have women be treated "less than" men?
Like the manosphere influencers, these outlets are animated by a grievance against 'wokeness' and the belief that conservatives are the real oppressed minority. They claim that the liberal media and Hollywood are promoting feminist propaganda, and so they must fight back.
Holy 1984, Batman.
"They claim that..."
So just to be clear: The Guardian knows all of these very different women are part of an alt-right chauvinistic plot ... but it thinks there's no substantive evidence that Hollywood, the government, corporate media, and schools have been censoring dissenting voices or promoting feminist propaganda??
Look at this quote from former Daily Wire commentator Brett Cooper:
BABIES GIVE YOU MORE JOY THAN CUBICLES??
THOUGHTCRIME!
The type of woman these commentators valorize is thin, straight, fertile, traditionally feminine, conventionally attractive to men and white - though they try to avoid overt racism...
I'm sorry, I can't read any more of this drivel.
"They're not racist overtly but we know they are secretly racist in their hearts."
Get outta here with that nonsense.
Anyway, The Guardian wants to protect vulnerable young women from being led out of the pro-abortion, sterilized, medicated, and obese camp.
And to show young women just how scary the "thin, fertile, and Republican" influencers are, they added some scary pics like this to their article 👇
YOUNG WOMEN: DOESN'T THIS SEEM SO UNCOOL??
Write a hundred more articles like this, Guardian. Your marketing strategy is genius!
P.S. Now check out our latest video 👇
